androiddevelopers asked:
Part 1 of 3 in an overview series on the Android platform. In this segment, Mike gives an overview of the system architecture.
July 19th, 2008 at 2:11 am
Right. When talking Android just replace bytecode with ‘dalvik’. Also no .class files, its .dex.
July 21st, 2008 at 3:08 pm
dalvik VM is not reading a standard bytecode?
July 23rd, 2008 at 6:49 am
Ah . yah. Next time I’ll watch the whole video. He mentions Java a couple times, but Java is in the applications framework layer and the applications layer. oops. Native libraries could still be C.
July 23rd, 2008 at 7:28 pm
This was posted in Nov 2007. The layer where he mentions C and C++ is now Java. The native libraries layer. Java compiles to dalvik instead of bytecode.
July 25th, 2008 at 7:53 am
YAY linux phone
July 26th, 2008 at 3:54 am
Yes, thanks to Java and XML.
July 27th, 2008 at 7:59 pm
What about Java!!??
July 30th, 2008 at 9:06 am
Just like IP has stood the test of time, and will for many years to come, Java and XML have matured and are now very, very ready for very, very prime time over the coming decade+.
IP + Java + XML are the critical pillars of the evolving Web.
July 31st, 2008 at 3:12 pm
java and xml.. didn’t technology advance the last few years?..
August 2nd, 2008 at 11:25 pm
somebody know…..When the Gphone in Mexico is commercialized??
thanks.
August 4th, 2008 at 11:35 pm
gostaria de receber informações em Português (BRASIL)
August 8th, 2008 at 3:49 am
if i help, can i have germany? all those prostitu… i mean servicewomen shall need a great leader
August 9th, 2008 at 2:58 pm
dont we all my frien? dont we all?
August 9th, 2008 at 6:13 pm
What about Symbian? Looks promising, if they really do open Symbian as well. Then we have two open platforms for mobile phones. I think the more the merrier. Possibly even a fusion of the two since they are both open.
August 11th, 2008 at 7:03 am
Android is very promising. It’s only the beginning and it will become better like in any Linux distro. It’s funny that we now have AGAIN 3 platforms but in phones. Apple, M$ and Linux. But unlike M$ that has some standards and Apple that has only one piece of hardware to worry about, android is a more difficult project to deal with, since it is geared to run in as many hardware variations as possible. So we have to give the android team and Google some credit for a great engineering effort.
August 14th, 2008 at 3:57 pm
What a heck are you yelling at?
There is another meaning to “free”, on that is older than “opensource”.
August 15th, 2008 at 8:08 am
UUU Yeah, I luv the 21st century I luv it I luv it!!!
August 15th, 2008 at 8:57 am
read
Don’t laugh at this! Just do it
Start thinking something you really really want cause this is
astounding the person that sent this to me said their wish came true 10
mins after they read the mail so I thought what the heck
You have just been visited by DrSuess’s Cat in the Hat. He will grant
you
one wish
Make your wish when the count down is over
10,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1
MAKE A WISH
Send this to 10 videos within the hour you read this.
If you do, your wish will come true
August 15th, 2008 at 2:12 pm
What are you talking about? It’s Open source, that means you are allowed to see all of the code put into making the OS and from that you can compile it so it’s exactly what they distribute, the only thing that will cost is the MOTHER FUCKING Service . . . But the OS is free
August 18th, 2008 at 10:03 am
You can compile anything yourself, doesn’t makit free.
August 19th, 2008 at 4:27 am
You’re probably able to use it for development. See, even this presentation seems to be made in Apple Keynote.
August 19th, 2008 at 7:41 am
does it work on iPone or a imac
August 21st, 2008 at 7:01 am
I guess… but I was just sayin
August 23rd, 2008 at 10:39 pm
well if something is open source than you can compile it for yourself and it will be free….
August 24th, 2008 at 3:52 pm
Open Source is not necessarily free…